The Hypocrisy of Mitch McConnell

February 14, 2016 by islandersvoice1


Sen. McConnell demonstrated what a despicable  human being he is by famously reacting on election night in 2008 to Barack Obama’s election as president by saying it would be his number one priority in 2009 – 2012 to make Obama a one-term president. Nothing about fulfilling his primary obligation as a senate leader to work for the benefit of all citizens of the USA. His statement yesterday that he would block Obama’s replacement for Scalia is certainly consistent with this view. But it also shows his complete hypocrisy when compared to his statements in 2005 found below. Then again, he is a Republican, so no big surprise.

Sen. Mitch McConnell in 2005: “The President, and the President alone, nominates judges”.

February 13, 2016 by Hunter, Daily Kos

Sen. Mitch McConnell, in 2005, defending the absolute right of a sitting president to nominate judges:

  • “The Constitution of the United States is at stake. Article II, Section 2 clearly provides that the President, and the President alone, nominates judges. The Senate is empowered to give advice and consent. But my Democratic colleagues want to change the rules. They want to reinterpret the Constitution to require a supermajority for confirmation. In effect, they would take away the power to nominate from the President and grant it to a minority of 41 Senators.”
  • “[T]he Republican conference intends to restore the principle that, regardless of party, any President’s judicial nominees, after full debate, deserve a simple up-or-down vote. I know that some of our colleagues wish that restoration of this principle were not required. But it is a measured step that my friends on the other side of the aisle have unfortunately made necessary. For the first time in 214 years, they have changed the Senate’s ‘advise and consent’ responsibilities to ‘advise and obstruct.'”

Take it from Sen. Mitch McConnell: for the Senate to block a sitting president from nominating a Supreme Court nominee—not just a specific nominee, mind you, but any nominee at all, would put the Constitution of the United States itself at stake. And he’s a patriot, so he would never even consider such a thing.

%d bloggers like this: